Purchase plans held far more strongly for mass-market, domestic and RV
buyers than for premium, imported and sedan intenders, the latest `Say-Do
Gap` analysis shows.
The Say-Do Gap Series
III: Premium vs.
Mass-Market Brand Purchases within One Year
- 33% of premium-brand intenders bought a mass-market brand, while only 5%
of mass-market intenders moved to premium.
- Plan realization was far higher for mass-market brands and domestic cars
(95% and 94%) than for premium brands and imported cars (67% and 71%).
- Among premium brands, BMW led with a 65% realization rate, followed by
Mercedes-Benz at 52% and Genesis at 42%.
- RV intentions held far more strongly than sedan intentions: 91% versus
73%. Midsize RVs had the highest realization rate among segment/body types,
at 81%.
- Gasoline and EV intenders posted realization rates of 71% and 72%,
compared with 63% for hybrids (HEV) and just 33% for diesel and 22% for LPG.
SEOUL, South Korea - May 21, 2026 - ConsumerInsight today released the third report in its `The Say-Do Gap`
series, examining how consumers` stated auto purchase intentions changed by
the time they actually bought a new car. The analysis compares plan
realization rates by origin, brand tier, vehicle type and segment, and fuel
type.
The central finding: among consumers who said they intended to buy a premium
brand within one year, one in three, or 33%, ultimately bought a mass-market
brand instead. By contrast, only 5% of those who intended to buy a
mass-market brand moved the other way and bought a premium brand. The
results show that aspirations formed before shopping - for an imported or
premium car - are often revised downward by the time of final purchase.
At the Final Payment Stage: `Compromising with Budget Reality`
The Say-Do Gap was largest in brand tier and vehicle origin. The plan
realization rate - the share of buyers who purchased a car with the same
attribute they originally intended - was 67% for premium-brand intenders and
71% for imported-car intenders [Table 1]. By comparison,
95% of mass-market-brand intenders bought a mass-market brand, and 94% of
domestic-car intenders bought a domestic car. Roughly three in ten consumers
who set out to buy a premium or imported car ultimately scaled back to a
mass-market or domestic model at the point of purchase.
[Table 1] Purchase Intention Realization Rate by Brand Tier and Origin
Based on 1-year purchase intenders who actually bought (N varies by
category)
| Categroy |
Realization Rate (%) |
Attrition Rate (%) |
| By Brand Tier |
|
|
| └ Premium Brands |
67 |
33 |
| └ Mass-Market Brands |
95 |
5 |
| By Origin |
|
|
| └ Imported Cars |
71 |
29 |
| └ Domestic Cars |
94 |
6 |
Premium Top Three: BMW Leads, but Attrition Paths Differ
Results also varied sharply among the three major premium brands covered in
the report. BMW had the highest plan realization rate at 65%, followed by
Mercedes-Benz at 52% and Genesis at 42%, with gaps of more than 10
percentage points between each brand [Table 2]. Among BMW
intenders, 19% chose a Hyundai Motor Group brand (Kia, Hyundai or Genesis
combined), while only 2% moved to Mercedes-Benz.
[Table 2]
Purchase Intention and Top Attrition Paths for Premium Brands
Base: premium-brand intenders (n as noted)
| Intended Brand (Sample Size) |
Realization Rate (%) |
Attrition Paths (Destination & Rate)
|
| BMW (n=62) |
65 |
1. Kia (11%) 2. Hyundai (5%) 3. Genesis (3%) 4. Mercedes-Benz (2%)
|
| Mercedes-Benz (n=46) |
52 |
1. BMW (17%) 2. Kia (13%) 3. Genesis (4%) |
| Genesis (n=142) |
42 |
1. Hyundai (22%) 2. Kia (17%) 3. BMW (4%) 4. Mercedes-Benz (2%)
|
Among Mercedes-Benz intenders, 17% chose BMW and 13% chose Kia - together
accounting for more than half of Mercedes-Benz`s 48% attrition. BMW`s win
over Mercedes-Benz was decisive: only 2% of BMW intenders moved to
Mercedes-Benz, while 17% of Mercedes-Benz intenders moved to BMW. The shift
may partly reflect the wave of rumors linking Mercedes-Benz and Chinese-made
components that followed the August 2024 Incheon Cheongna apartment fire.
Genesis had the lowest realization rate among the three at 42%, but 39% of
Genesis intenders chose a Hyundai Motor Group brand - nearly matching its
own realization rate - which limited real losses to brands outside the
group. Notably, defectors from both BMW and Mercedes-Benz chose Kia over
Hyundai by a wide margin, suggesting that an affinity for premium imports
may correlate with resistance specifically to the Hyundai brand rather than
to Hyundai Motor Group as a whole.
Midsize RVs Post the Highest Realization Rate, at 81%
By vehicle type, practical choices were more likely to hold. RV intenders
had a 91% realization rate, compared with 73% for sedan intenders
[Table 3]. Looking at segment and body type together,
midsize RVs had the highest realization rate at 81%, followed by small
sedans (67%), small RVs and large sedans (66% each), and large RVs (62%).
Midsize sedans - once the standard family car - recorded the lowest rate
among all attributes measured in the report, at 55%, with nearly half of
midsize-sedan intenders switching to a different segment or body type. The
result points to a broader consumer shift toward larger vehicles alongside
continued RV strength.
[Table 3]
Purchase Intention Realization Rate by Vehicle Type and Segment/Body
Type
Based on 1-year purchase intenders who actually bought
| Category |
Realization Rate (%) |
| By Vehicle Type |
|
| RV |
91 |
| Sedan |
73 |
| By Segment / Body Type |
|
| Midsize RV |
81 |
| Small Sedan |
67 |
| Small RV |
66 |
| Large Sedan |
66 |
| Large RV |
62 |
| Midsize Sedan |
55 |
The Hybrid Paradox: A Lower Realization Rate Than Gasoline
Fuel-type results point to a `hybrid paradox.` Gasoline and electric vehicle
(EV) intenders posted plan realization rates of 71% and 72% respectively,
while hybrid (HEV) intenders recorded 63%; diesel and LPG intenders were
lowest, at 33% and 22% [Table 4]. ConsumerInsight said the
pattern likely reflects real-world constraints on hybrids - higher prices
and long delivery waits - rather than cooling demand, as consumers who
originally wanted a hybrid shifted to other fuel types when faced with those
obstacles.
[Table 4]
Purchase Intention Realization Rate by Fuel Type
Based on 1-year purchase intenders who actually bought
| Fuel Type |
Realization Rate (%) |
| EV (Electric) |
72 |
| Gasoline |
71 |
| HEV (Hybrid) |
63 |
| Diesel |
33 |
| LPG |
22 |
Understanding Why Consumers Trade Down
The Say-Do Gap has long been one of the toughest challenges for marketers.
This report gives them a clearer picture: realization rates run consistently
higher for domestic, mass-market, RV and EV choices, and the data point to
some of the reasons why. ConsumerInsight said further analysis will refine
these explanations and support a more evidence-based approach to
understanding automotive consumers.
Notes
- Analysis base: This analysis is based on 31,852 respondents who
participated continuously in ConsumerInsight`s 2024~2025 Annual Automobile
Syndicated Study, narrowed to consumers who stated in 2024 that they
planned to buy a new car within one year and actually did so.
(ConsumerInsight 2024~2025 Annual Automobile Syndicated Study)
- Metric definition: `Plan realization rate` means the share of buyers who
purchased a car with the same attribute they originally intended, such as
the same origin, brand tier, vehicle type/segment or fuel type.
(ConsumerInsight definition)
- RV definition: RV refers to recreational vehicles, contrasted with
sedans in the vehicle-type analysis. (ConsumerInsight report terminology)
- Hyundai Motor Group brands: For the purposes of this report, Hyundai
Motor Group brands comprise Hyundai, Kia and Genesis. (ConsumerInsight
report terminology)
Methodology
ConsumerInsight has conducted its Annual Automobile Syndicated Study every
July since 2001 with an annual sample of roughly 100,000 automotive
consumers (95,696 respondents in the 2025 wave). This analysis matched
31,852 respondents who participated in both the 2024 and 2025 waves and
compared each respondent`s 2024 stated one-year purchase intention with
their actual vehicle purchase behavior as of the 2025 survey.
- Population: Licensed drivers who own a vehicle or plan to purchase one
within two years
- Sampling frame: ConsumerInsight’s Invight Panel and quota-based samples
from major Korean portal-site panels
- Sampling method: Gender- and age-based quota sampling
- Survey mode: Email and mobile survey
- Survey content: Usage & Attitude (U&A) and Consumer Experienced Quality
(CEQ)
- Survey period: July 2023 and July 2025
About ConsumerInsight
ConsumerInsight is a leading South Korean market research firm
specializing in automotive consumer data and analytics. Since 2001, it has
conducted the Annual Automobile Syndicated Study, surveying approximately
100,000 automotive consumers every July - one of the largest continuous
automotive consumer studies in the world. Drawing on more than two decades
of longitudinal data, ConsumerInsight provides in-depth insight into
consumer behavior, market trends, and industry benchmarks.
For more information, please visit
https://www.consumerinsight.co.kr/eng/
Copyright ⓒ ConsumerInsight. All rights reserved.
This material may be
quoted or cited by media for news purposes. Any other form of reproduction,
distribution, or secondary use requires prior written consent.